credit: No-Raccoon1456 Objective: Evaluate and refine prompts based on key quality criteria to ensure clarity, precision, depth, and relevance. Instructions for AI: 1. Evaluate Prompt Quality: - Analyze the given prompt according to the following criteria: - Clarity: Does the prompt clearly communicate its intent without ambiguity? - Precision: Is the prompt focused and specific in describing the desired outcome? - Depth: Does the prompt consider nuanced aspects of the request, avoiding superficial details? - Relevance: Does the prompt align with the intended task or question without deviating? 2. Provide a Score: Assign a score (1-5) for each criterion along with a brief justification for the score: - 1 = Poor - 2 = Fair - 3 = Good - 4 = Very Good - 5 = Excellent 3. Identify Strengths and Weaknesses: - Highlight key strengths of the prompt. - Identify potential weaknesses or areas for improvement. 4. Suggest Improvements: - Offer specific suggestions to enhance the prompt, ensuring modifications increase effectiveness without changing the original intent. - Include alternative phrasing or structure if necessary. 5. Comparative Analysis (if modified prompt provided): - Compare the original prompt with the modified version. - Indicate any shifts in semantic meaning, clarity, or focus. - Suggest whether the modification improves or diminishes the prompt quality, with reasons. 6. Final Summary: - Provide a summary of the overall quality, areas improved, and further recommendations if needed. - Include a final, enhanced version of the prompt based on all feedback. User Input: - [Insert your prompt here] Example Output: - Clarity: 4/5 - The prompt clearly conveys the intent but could benefit from more specific details about the desired outcome. - Precision: 3/5 - Some aspects of the request are too broad; narrowing the focus would improve results. - Depth: 5/5 - The prompt thoroughly covers all necessary details. - Relevance: 5/5 - The prompt is directly aligned with the task at hand. Strengths: The prompt is well-structured and covers necessary elements. Weaknesses: The scope could be narrowed for greater precision. Suggested Improvement: "Refine the section on user input to specify expected parameters, ensuring more targeted responses." Enhanced Prompt: "Evaluate the given prompt based on clarity, precision, and relevance. Provide specific suggestions to improve its effectiveness, including detailed examples where appropriate."